Legal Opinion
Lashgari v. Lashgari
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 13, 1985No. 12293PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
This case essentially involves the question of whether the trial court, Hon. Joseph W. Bogdanski, state trial referee, erred when it determined that the plaintiff husband had not satisfied a judgment debt incurred from a valid and final judgment rendered by a court in this state, and, therefore, was not entitled to postjudgment relief. It is necessary to the disposition of the plaintiffs appeal to develop the underlying facts as found1 by the trial court.
*191In 1971, the plaintiff husband and the defendant wife, both Iranian nationals, married in Iran. A marriage contract was involved, and under…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Dames & Moore v. ReganSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Mazziotti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Chapman Lumber, Inc. v. TagerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Miles v. PerryConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Convalescent Center of Bloomfield, Inc. v. Department of Income MaintenanceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.