Legal Opinion
Clark v. Clark
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 6, 2001No. AC 19087PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
This is an appeal from a postjudgment modification rendered in a dissolution of marriage action. The plaintiff, Mary Clark, appeals from the order of the trial court partially granting her motion for modification of the alimony order. The plaintiff claims on *659appeal that the court improperly (1) determined that her alimony could not be modified on the basis of the “substantial change [of] circumstances” ground provided in General Statutes § 46b-86 (a), (2) excluded testimony regarding the grounds for the breakdown of the parties’ marriage, (3) found that at the time of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Pasquariello v. PasquarielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Leo v. LeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Hardisty v. HardistySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Issler v. IsslerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Demartino v. DemartinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Bijur v. BijurConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Tracey v. TraceyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Lamacchia v. ChilinskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.