Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 12, 1995No. 13064PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.

The defendant appeals from the trial court’s decision granting the plaintiffs motion to modify an order of child support. On appeal, the defendant argues that the trial court improperly (1) increased his child support obligation in response to the plaintiffs motion, (2) retroactively modified a prior judge’s order concerning child support payments, and (3) proceeded with the hearing on the plaintiffs motion in the absence of sworn affidavits from both parties. We disagree with the defendant’s arguments and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The record reveals the following facts. On June…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re Baby Girl B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Sanchione v. SanchioneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  3. Favrow v. VargasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Sachs v. SachsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  5. Glinski v. GlinskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chestone v. Chestone, No. Fa 96 130722 (Nov. 13, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
  2. Commissioner of Human Resources v. Holmes, No. Fa89-0050364 (Aug. 31, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
  3. Johnson v. Newton, No. 19730-F (Jun. 17, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
  4. Washburn v. O'reilly, No. Fa 86 0315735 (Feb. 17, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API