Legal Opinion

Schorsch v. Schorsch

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 18, 1999No. AC 16802PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LANDAU, J.

The defendant, John Schorsch, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his postdis-solution motion to modify his alimony payments and granting the motion for contempt filed by the plaintiff, Marjorie Schorsch. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) failed to rule on the threshold question as to whether there was a substantial *380change in circumstances,1 (2) found that there was no change in the defendant’s financial circumstances since the time of the dissolution of the marriage, (3) compelled the defendant to deplete an asset awarded to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Hardisty v. HardistySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Rubin v. RubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Bunche v. BuncheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Simms v. SimmsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Gay v. GaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. Bleuer v. BleuerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. Gay v. GayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Spencer v. SpencerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API