Legal Opinion

In re Review of the Alt. Energy Rider Contained in the Tariffs of Ohio Edison Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 2018No. 2013–2026PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO'Neill, J.

*289I. SUMMARY

{¶ 1} In the case on appeal, the Public Utilities Commission ordered an audit to review renewable-energy-credit ("REC") purchases made by the FirstEnergy companies (Ohio Edison Company, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, and Toledo Edison Company [ (collectively, "FirstEnergy") ] ) under FirstEnergy's first electric-security plan ("ESP"). After the audit hearing, the commission found that certain purchases had not been prudent, and it ordered FirstEnergy to refund more than $43 million to ratepayers.

{¶ 2} The commission also granted several motions for protective orders,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Plain Dealer v. Ohio Dept. of InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Besser v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Monongahela Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Ohio Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Claims · 2020
  2. In re Application of Ohio Edison Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Buduson v. ClevelandOhio Court of Claims · 2019
  4. Coon v. OhioHealth Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. Doe v. Ohio State Univ.Ohio Court of Claims · 2023

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API