Legal Opinion
Ohio Edison Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 21, 1997No. 95-2575PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
Appellant poses numerous propositions of law arguing that the commission erred in its interpretation of R.C. 4905.34 and overstepped its authority in finding that Ohio Edison violated R.C. 4905.33. Each party also filed supplemental briefs on the two questions that we raised sua sponte: “Did the commission find that R.C. 4905.34 applies in the case at bar?” and “Does R.C. 4905.34 apply in a case involving a competitive bidding situation?” For the *469reasons that follow, we find that R.C. 4905.33 and 4905.34 are clear,'unambiguous, and not in conflict. We also hold that a public utility’s right…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Provident Bank v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Time Warner AxS v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Allnet Communications Services, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Industrial Energy Consumers of Ohio Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Sunoco, Inc. (R & M) v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
- In re Application of Black Fork Wind Energy, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Elyria Foundry Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Discount Cellular, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.