Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs.
Ohio Court of Claims
Decided August 25, 2020No. 2019-00789PQPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs.,
2020-Ohio-4856.] THE CINCINNATI ENQUIRER, A Case No. 2019-00789PQ DIVISION OF GANNETT GP MEDIA, INC. Special Master Jeff Clark Requester REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Respondent The Ohio Public Records Act (PRA) {¶1} “Public records are one portal through which the people observe their government, ensuring its accountability, integrity, and equity while minimizing sovereign mischief and malfeasance.” Kish v. Akron, 109 Ohio St.3d 162,
2006-Ohio-1244, 846 N.E.2d 811, ¶ 16. “[T]he inherent,…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. PostOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Langer v. Ohio State Univ. Office of Univ. Compliance & IntegrityOhio Court of Claims · 2023
- Dye v. ClevelandOhio Court of Claims · 2025
- Hicks v. Union Twp., Clermont Cty., TrusteesOhio Court of Claims · 2022
- Jones v. Dept. of Youth Serv.Ohio Court of Claims · 2023
- Seiverth v. PerrysburgOhio Court of Claims · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.