Ferrell v. Basnight
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
Plaintiff, appellant, does not contend his rights are in any wise prejudiced by the judgment. Admittedly the court has answered the questions which plaintiff wanted answered and which are determinative of the rights of the parties. Mrs. Alexander did not deny the allegation in the complaint that Mrs. Bell, when she referred to her half sister, meant Mrs. Etheridge and not Mrs. Alexander. In fact Mrs. Alexander not only did not deny the allegation but executed the written instrument acknowledging that fact. She has not appealed from the judgment determinative of her rights.
The remaining…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gregg v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Dickey v. HerbinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Langley v. GoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- WALDRON BUICK COMPANY v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- In Re the Estate of CogdillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Coburn v. Roanoke Land and Timber CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Yount v. YountSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Shocket v. SilbermanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1969
- First Union National Bank v. MelvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.