Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Cogdill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1957No. 25PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

The record discloses no action or appearance by any of the six children subsequent to their renunciation in favor of the respective nominees. Styles as nominee is the sole applicant, petitioner, movant and appellant in the successive proceedings stated above.

It would seem that as between Styles and Hennessee, nothing else appearing, the clerk had authority in his discretion to issue letters of administration to either Styles or Hennessee. In re Saville, 156 N.C. 172, 72 S.E. 220. Instead, she issued letters of administration to Thorn-burg. The record discloses no data concerning Thornburg’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Sams'estateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Edwards v. . McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Murrill v. . SandlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. Edwards v. . CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. In Re Palmer's WillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harriet Cotton Mills v. Local Union No. 578, Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Pruett v. PruettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Ferrell v. BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. In re the Foreclosure of HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Hagins v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API