Legal Opinion

Dickey v. Herbin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1959No. 604PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooRe, J.

It is clearly apparent that the rulings of the court below to which the executor excepts are not adverse to the interests of •the L. F. Troxler estate, but are adverse to Lacy Dickey, individually, and the other residuary legatee and devisee. In the trial below the executor contended, and contends here, that the lapsed devises and legacies of R. L. Summers should not go intestate, but should go to the surviving residuary legatees and devisees, namely, Lacy Dickey and Grover 0. Dickey. Pie further contends that if they do go intestate, that the debts and costs of administration should be paid…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Williams v. BabbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Freeman v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Baker v. VarserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Henderson County v. . SmythSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Gregg v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Bailey v. GoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. BrileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API