Langley v. Gore
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
This appeal is directed solely to the judgment of the court below in respect to disposition of the fund of money in the hands of the Clerk of Superior Court. But there is nothing in the record to show that defendants have any interest in, or claim to it. Indeed, defendants say in their brief, filed on this appeal, that they “did not claim the fund as theirs personally.” They assert, however, reasons why they think plaintiffs are not entitled to the fund. Nevertheless, they are not the parties aggrieved.
Any party aggrieved may appeal in the cases prescribed in Chapter 1 of General Statutes…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Baker v. VarserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Henderson County v. . SmythSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Watkins v. . GrierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Watkins v. GrierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Coburn v. Roanoke Land and Timber CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Dickey v. HerbinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- WALDRON BUICK COMPANY v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Ferrell v. BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.