Gregg v. Williamson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
No exceptions are taken to the findings of fact. Indeed, they substantially conform with the allegations of the complaint. Do these findings suffice to support the judgment? Plaintiff insists that to apply G.S. 45-37 (5), as amended in 1945, would impair the obligation of the Pate mortgage given in 1921, in violation of Art. I, sec. 10(1) of the Constitution of the United States. This assertion necessitates an understanding of the rights which plaintiff could assert without regard to the statute, what the statute does, and its effect, if any, on plaintiff’s rights.
When Minnie Mae Pate…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Vance v. VanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Turner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Wynn v. GrantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Stevens v. TurlingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Williams v. . TeacheySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brannock v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Greene v. Town of ValdeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Sprouse v. North River InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- In re the Foreclosure of the Deed of Trust of Vogler Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.