Legal Opinion
Consolidated Gas Utilities Co. v. Beatie
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 21, 1933No. 21675PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.
Edna P. Beatie sued the Consolidated Gas Utilities Company, a corporation, and Roy L. Parsons in the district court of Grant county for damages for personal injuries. The issues were joined and the cause tried to a jury. A verdict .was rendered in favor of plaintiff and against the Consolidated Gas Utilities Company, and for the defendant Roy L. Parsons. The verdict was for $1,100. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiff lived at Medford, Okla., and the defendant corporation was engaged in the business of furnishing gas to the citizens of said town.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. JopesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. ReinhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Spruce v. Chicago, R. I. & P. RY. CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Braden v. HendricksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Mid-Continent Pipeline Co. v. CrauthersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Bladen v. First Presbyterian Church of SallisawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Hooper by and Through Hooper v. Clements FoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Glens Falls Insurance Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.