Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 21, 1915No. 4818PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County; Edward Dewes Oldfield, Judge. Action by Florence M. Brooks against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company and others. Judgment for plaintiff against the defendant Railway Company, and it brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant in error Florence M. Brooks, as plaintiff, sued the plaintiff in error and others in the superior court of Oklahoma county to recover damages for the death of her husband, Roy Brooks, who she alleged was killed at Elk City, Okla., through the negligence of the defendants. Among the other allegations of her petition the plaintiff alleged that Roy Brooks at the time of his death was a citizen of the State of Oklahoma, and that he left surviving him the plaintiff and one child. At the trial of the case and after all the evidence had been offered, and after both parties had rested,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Shawnee Gas & Electric Co. v. MotesenbockerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Motsenbocker v. Shawnee Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. PerinoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. S. H. Kress & Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. Consolidated Gas Utilities Co. v. BeatieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Midland Valley R. Co. v. TownesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API