Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Reinhart
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Atolca County; Robert M. Rainey, Judge. Action by Robert L. Reinhart and another against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment against the railway company, and it brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HOOKER, 0.
The evidence here introduced in conformity with the allegations of the petition discloses that on the 17th day of October, 190S, the plaintiff Reinhart boarded a combination train of the defendant company at Coalgate for the purpose of being transported as a passenger to Edwards, Okla., and upon entering the coach he paid to the conductor, one Hughes, his fare: that this train was the only train in operation that day between said points, and that when the train arrived at Wardville about 3 o'clock of that day the plaintiff inquired of the conductor. Hughes, how long the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. JopesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Smith v. SteenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Emmons v. Southern Pac. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- City of Tulsa v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Braden v. HendricksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Sopkin v. Premier Pontiac, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Patterson v. RisherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.