Legal Opinion

Mid-Continent Pipeline Co. v. Crauthers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 23, 1954No. 35319PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

Parties will be designatéd ás in the trial court.

Plaintiff sued defendant for damages allegedly resulting from the pollution of a natural watercourse' running through plaintiff’s land.

Most of the facts were stipulated, substantially as follows: plaintiff owned á certain designated quarter section of land. 'C. R. Colpitt and T. S. Colpitt owned and operated an oil lease in a section adjoining the section wherein plaintiff’s land was located. Defendant Mid-Continent Pipeline Company owned and operated ⅛ Certain pipe line which' was used to transport oil from the lease of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Franklin Drilling Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Consolidated Gas Utilities Co. v. BeatieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Texas Co. v. MosshamerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Shell Petroleum Corporation v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Johnson Oil Refining Co. v. CarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Theophelis v. Lansing General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Anderson v. EichnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Braden v. HendricksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Max v. SpaethSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. Woodrum v. JohnsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API