Braden v. Hendricks
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
Four questions are presented on certiora-ri: (1) Was there prejudicial error in the trial court’s granting defendant-manufacturer’s motion in limine? (2) Did the trial court reversibly err in disallowing, on cross-examination, an inquiry into the salary of the manufacturer’s witness-employee whose opinion testimony was sought to be impeached for bias? (3) Did the trial court’s Instruction No. 4 constitute reversible error? and (4) Was the Court of Appeals’ reversal of the trial court’s judgment on the defendant-dealer’s [dealer] demurrer to the evidence legally correct? We…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Anderson v. EichnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- State v. James Edward S.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. A.A.R. Western Skyways, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.