Legal Opinion

Braden v. Hendricks

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 19, 1985No. 53962PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

Four questions are presented on certiora-ri: (1) Was there prejudicial error in the trial court’s granting defendant-manufacturer’s motion in limine? (2) Did the trial court reversibly err in disallowing, on cross-examination, an inquiry into the salary of the manufacturer’s witness-employee whose opinion testimony was sought to be impeached for bias? (3) Did the trial court’s Instruction No. 4 constitute reversible error? and (4) Was the Court of Appeals’ reversal of the trial court’s judgment on the defendant-dealer’s [dealer] demurrer to the evidence legally correct? We…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. Anderson v. EichnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. State v. James Edward S.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. A.A.R. Western Skyways, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API