Legal Opinion

McAuliffe v. Western States Import Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1995No. 94-354PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The sole issue in this case is which statute of limitations governs product liability actions against manufacturers brought pursuant to R.C. 2307.71 et seq., the Ohio Product Liability Act. We initially note that the General Assembly did not specifically provide a statute of limitations for product liability actions. See R.C. 2305.01 through 2305.22 and R.C. 2307.71 through 2307.80. As a result, R.C. 2305.03 directs us to apply one of the general statutes of limitations contained in R.C. 2305.04 through 2305.22.

The court of appeals concluded that McAuliffe’s product liability action brought…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Lonzrick v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Andrianos v. Community Traction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Crislip v. TCH Liquidating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. McKinleyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Carrel v. Allied Products Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,948 Carla Kurczi v. Eli Lilly and Company (96-4124) Dart Industries, Inc., F/k/a Rexall Drug Company (96-4127)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Westfield Insurance v. Huls America, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Perez v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1997

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API