Legal Opinion

Perez v. Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1997No. 96-108PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

In this case we determine whether that portion of R.C. 313.19 authorizing judicial review of a coroner’s verdict regarding the cause of death and the manner and mode in which the death occurred can be given effect under the Due Process Clauses of our state and federal Constitutions or whether that portion of the statute is void for vagueness. R.C. 313.19 states:

“The cause of death and the manner and mode in which the death occurred, as delivered by the coroner and incorporated in the coroner’s verdict and in the death certifícate filed with the division of vital statistics, shall be the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hardin v. Kentucky Utilities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. State v. DorsoOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. WardOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. State v. AveryOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Klein v. LeisOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Buckley v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API