Legal Opinion

Crislip v. TCH Liquidating Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1990No. 89-447PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The Crislips, plaintiffs-appellees, do not allege a design or manufacturing defect in the Timber Iron Furnace Caddy. Rather, they claim that the failure of defendant-appellant, TCH Liquidating Company, to adequately warn them of the danger of carbon monoxide poisoning rendered the Timber Iron unreasonably dangerous. This court has adopted Section 402A of 2 Restatement of the Law 2d, Torts (1965) 347, along with Comment j, at 353, which allows a cause of action in strict liability when failure to warn renders a product unreasonably dangerous. Thus, we agree with the court of appeals that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Phillips v. Kimwood MacHine CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Flaugher v. Cone Automatic Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Ezzie Welch, Administrator of the Estate of Samuel Welch v. Outboard Marine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cantrell v. GAF Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. Leibreich v. A.J. Refrigeration, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Miles v. Kohli & Kaliher Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. City of Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API