Legal Opinion

Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. McKinley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 2011No. 2010-0720PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*157Cupp, J.

{¶ 1} This case arises because the settlement of a personal-injury suit brought by a recipient of workers’ compensation benefits against a third-party tortfeasor did not make any provision to repay the statutory subrogee, plaintiff-appellee, the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation. The bureau brought suit against both the recipient of workers’ compensation benefits and the third-party tortfeasor under R.C. 4123.931(G) to recover the full amount of its subrogation interest. The third-party tortfeasor raised a statute-of-limitations defense. The trial court held that a two-year…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Perrysburg Township v. City of RossfordOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Doe v. Archdiocese of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. Alford v. Collins-McGregor Operating Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Tuleta v. Med. Mut. of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Saeed v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Browne v. Artex Oil Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Doe v. Greenville City SchoolsOhio Supreme Court · 2022

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API