Legal Opinion

Carrel v. Allied Products Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1997No. 95-1773PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

This case presents three issues for our review. First, we are asked to decide whether a common-law cause of action, negligent design, survives the enactment of R.C. 2307.71 et seq., the Ohio Products Liability Act. In addition, the court is asked to determine whether the law applicable to assumption of the risk as set forth in Cremeans v. Willmar Henderson Mfg. Co. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 145, 566 N.E.2d 1203, is available under R.C. 2307.71 et seq. Finally, we must decide whether summary judgment was erroneously entered in the manufacturer’s favor. For the following…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Leichtamer v. American Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Anderson v. CeccardiOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Knitz v. Minster Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Bowling v. Heil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. McAuliffe v. Western States Import Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. City of Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Wimbush Ex Rel. Estate of Buchanan v. WyethCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. Vaccariello v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. White v. Depuy, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API