Legal Opinion
Irwin v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 28, 1998No. SC 15714PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The plaintiff, James B. Irwin, Sr., sought approval of a four lot subdivision on approximately fifteen acres of property that he owns in Litchfield, with a lot configuration consisting of two interior lots, necessitating a special exception under article VI, § 5A,1 *621of the Litchfield zoning regulations. The dispositive issue in this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court was correct in reversing the trial court’s affirmance of the denial of the plaintiffs special exception application by the defendant, the planning and zoning commission of the town of Litchfield…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Schwartz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- A.P. & W. Holding Corp. v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Double I Ltd. Partnership v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Cambodian Buddhist Society of Connecticut, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Wood v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Quality Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Heithaus v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Hillside Community Church, S.B.C. v. OlsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.