Legal Opinion

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Geary

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 15, 1987No. C-86-5107 MHPPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PATEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff State Farm filed this action in March 1986 seeking a declaratory judgment that it has no obligation to indemnify or to defend the defendant Geary in an underlying state court action and to recover the value of the defense so far provided under a reservation of rights. This case is now before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment and defendant’s motion to amend her counterclaim to add two parties. For the reasons set forth below, partial summary judgment is granted to the plaintiff and denied to the defendant. In addition, defendant’s motion to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  3. San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. George A. Lies v. Farrell Lines, Inc. And Does One Through Ten, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Crane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Kuhn v. Account Control Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1994
  2. Beynon v. St. George-Dixie Lodge 1743Utah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Uhrich v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. GemCap Lending, LLC v. Quarles & Brady, LLPDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
  5. South Yuba River Citizens League v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API