Legal Opinion
George A. Lies v. Farrell Lines, Inc. And Does One Through Ten, Inclusive
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 6, 1981No. 79-4036PublishedCited by 203 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, Senior District Judge:
Appellant, George A. Lies, brought this action against appellee, Farrell Lines, Inc., under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, for injuries he received on July 4, 10 and 11, 1974, while working as a seaman on a vessel owned and operated by Farrell Lines. While the suit was pending, Lies was injured again in October, 1977, while working on another company’s vessel and claimed that this accident was caused in part by the injury of July 11, 1974. The district court granted the motion of Farrell Lines for partial summary judgment that Farrell Lines was not liable for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Kernan v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Agosto v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Joseph Daniel Holt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by203 opinions
- Burgess v. Premier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Brooktree Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- James E. Sochin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Dennis S. Brown v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Linda E. Lutz, as Parent and Next Friend of Catherine Lutz, a Minor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Marshall Gross v. Citimortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
198 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.