Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. FDP Corp.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PHILLIPS, Chief Justice.
Respondent’s motion for rehearing is granted. Our opinion of March 6, 1991 is withdrawn, and the following is substituted in its place.
The issue in this case is whether a seller’s partial failure to perform under a sales agreement may serve as the basis for a breach of warranty claim under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practice — Consumer Protection Act, Tex.Bus. & Com.Code §§ 17.41-17.63 (the “DTPA”). The court of appeals held that certain oral statements made by the seller to induce a sale constituted an express warranty, and that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. DeLanneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- La Sara Grain Co. v. First National Bank of MercedesTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Cate v. Dover Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Hycel, Inc. v. Wittstruck, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1985
- Martin v. Lou Poliquin Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Henry Schein, Inc. v. StromboeTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- PPG Industries, Inc. v. JMB/Houston Centers Partners Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Chilton Insurance Co. v. Pate & Pate Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.