Legal Opinion

Foutty v. Chalmax Sales Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1925No. 5131PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lively, President:

This verdict and judgment is a sequel to the case of Foutty v. Chalmax Sales Co., reported in 94 W. Va. 525, 119 S. E. 674. The controversy involves a sale and purchase of a 1921 model Maxwell automobile. The declaration is in assumpsit and is for a breach of warranty, alleging that the purchase from defendant was a 1921 model, sound and in good condition, and free from defects. On the first trial the case was-tried upon the theory of rescission, and the jury rendered a verdict for the entire amount paid by plaintiff for the car, $1,075.00. That verdict was set aside and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stringfellow v. Botterill Auto Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Foutty v. Chalmax Sales Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Ray Motor Co. v. StanyanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Hawkins v. McGeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
  3. State Road Commission v. BowlingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Payne v. Valley Motor Sales, IncorporatedWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Williams v. McClainMississippi Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API