Legal Opinion

Dingle v. Belin

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 11, 2000No. 98, Sept. Term, 1999PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

The issue before us was characterized by the Court of Special Appeals in this case as one of “ghost surgery.” The more precise question is whether a surgeon who is employed by a patient to perform certain surgery and who agrees, as part of that employment, to do the actual cutting, leaving to assisting residents a subordinate role, may be held liable for breach of contract, distinct from negligence in the performance of the surgery or negligence associated with the failure to obtain informed consent from the patient, if the surgeon attends and participates in the surgery but…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Faya v. AlmarazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Stewart v. RudnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Church v. PeralesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Dehn v. EdgecombeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Gohari v. DarvishCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Troyer v. AdamsHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Eid v. DukeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API