Legal Opinion

Coolidge & McClaine v. Saltmarsh

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1917No. 13742PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Douglas county, Steiner, J., entered April 20, 1916, upon findings in favor of the mortgagees, upon issues raised by defendant’s cross-complaint, in an action to foreclose a mortgage, tried to the court.

1Per curiam

— The plaintiff, Coolidge & McClaine, a corporation, as holder of a promissory note and mortgage executed by Robert S. Saltmarsh and Margaret Saltmarsh, brought an action against them to foreclose the same, making a party defendant also William McCowat, who held a subsequent mortgage covering the same land. The court rendered decree foreclosing the Coolidge & McClaine mortgage. On issues raised between the Saltmarshes and Mc-Cowat on the latter’s note and mortgage, which he held by transfer from the original payee, the court held that the note was a nonnegotiable one and therefore subject, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bright v. OffieldWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Walker v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Smith v. MyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Carmody v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Koppler v. BuggeWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Ferring v. VerweyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Kerr v. StauferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Teton Auto Co. v. Northwestern Pure Bred Sow Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Anderson v. HoardWashington Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API