Coolidge & McClaine v. Saltmarsh
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Douglas county, Steiner, J., entered April 20, 1916, upon findings in favor of the mortgagees, upon issues raised by defendant’s cross-complaint, in an action to foreclose a mortgage, tried to the court.
1Per curiam
— The plaintiff, Coolidge & McClaine, a corporation, as holder of a promissory note and mortgage executed by Robert S. Saltmarsh and Margaret Saltmarsh, brought an action against them to foreclose the same, making a party defendant also William McCowat, who held a subsequent mortgage covering the same land. The court rendered decree foreclosing the Coolidge & McClaine mortgage. On issues raised between the Saltmarshes and Mc-Cowat on the latter’s note and mortgage, which he held by transfer from the original payee, the court held that the note was a nonnegotiable one and therefore subject, in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bright v. OffieldWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Walker v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Smith v. MyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Carmody v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Koppler v. BuggeWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Ferring v. VerweyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Kerr v. StauferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Teton Auto Co. v. Northwestern Pure Bred Sow Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- Anderson v. HoardWashington Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.