Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Staufer

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1927No. File No. 6046PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MISER, C..

The question- that underlies all others in this case is whether the following- note is a negotiable instrument, the several parts of which, for convenience in reference, we indicate by letters:

“Vendor’s Lien Note.
“S,an Benito, Tex., June 15, 1920.

(A) “June xi, 1925, after date the undersigned promises to pay to the order of the Texas Delta Farms Company at Kansas City, Mo., in lawful moneys of the United States of America, the sum of $985.93, together with interest thereon from date until maturity at the rate of six per cent per annum, and thereafter until paid at the rate of ten…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bright v. OffieldWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Coleman v. ValentinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Coolidge & McClaine v. SaltmarshWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Tyng v. Constant-Loraine Inv. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jahnig v. CoismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Miller v. Baken Park, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Kerr v. StauferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Jahnig v. CoismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API