Legal Opinion

Bright v. Offield

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1914No. 11935PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dy It email, J., entered January 3, 1914, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on a promissory note, after a trial to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

— The plaintiff brought this action to recover judgment against the defendants as maker and indorsers of an instrument which reads as follows:

“On the first day of December, 1913, for value received, I promise to pay to Guaranty Loan & Investment Company, of Spokane, Washington, or order, the principal sum of fifteen hundred dollars ($1,500), with interest thereon, at the rate of eight per cent per year, from the date hereof until ma*444turity, payable semi-annually according to the tenor of six interest notes, each for sixty dollars (60), bearing even date herewith; both principal and interest…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thorp v. MindemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. In re Appropriations by General AssemblySupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  3. First National Bank of New Windsor v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Brooke v. StruthersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Holliday State Bank v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Nickell v. BradshawOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Westlake v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Mechanics Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. Utah State National Bank v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Bank of California v. National City Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API