Legal Opinion

Koppler v. Bugge

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1932No. 23442. Department TwoPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

The consideration of this case has been delayed somewhat out of its proper order on account of the magnitude of the record and briefs and its importance to the parties.

This action was brought by respondent Koppler and eleven others to reestablish, as a valid and subsisting lien, a certain mortgage given by appellants Bugge to Osner & Mehlhorn, Inc., as mortgagee, alleged to have been wrongfully satisfied by August Mehlhorn, Jr., an officer of the mortgagee corporation, and to have the mortgage established as a lien prior to a later mortgage executed in favor of Calvin Philips & Company, a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Henry v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Bright v. OffieldWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Bjorkstam v. Federal Land BankWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Western Security Co. v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Price v. Northern Bond & Mortgage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Beckmann v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Blodgett v. Olympic Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  3. Stohr v. RandleWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Ross v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Stockdale v. HorlacherWashington Supreme Court · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API