Ferring v. Verwey
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
The appellant claims it was error for the trial court to reject evidence of the facts pleaded in his answer by way of recoupment. Whether it was depends on whether the notes are negotiable instruments, as if they are not the defendant may interpose any defense that he might interpose against the payee named in the notes were the payee seeking foreclosure. The appellant claims the notes are not negotiable because the amount due thereon is uncertain, and bases his contention of uncertainty on the fact that each note contains a provision that it is secured by a mortgage and is to bear interest…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thorp v. MindemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- King Cattle Co. v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Donaldson v. GrantUtah Supreme Court · 1897
- Hubbard v. Robert B. Wallace Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Utah Lake Irr. Co. v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cont'nal Natl. Bk. of Ft. Worth v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Madera v. Herminio Madera, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1935
- Aaron v. MangoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Madera v. Herminio Madera, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1935