City of Colorado Springs v. Yust
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
The City of Colorado Springs petitioned for change of point of diversion of certain water rights from several tributaries of the Blue River, decreed to the East Hoosier and West Hoosier Ditches. It was alleged.that such change would not injuriously affect the vested right of other appropriators. Yust, the Colorado River Water Conservation District and Hill, filed protests. After hearing, the court found that petitioner had failed to establish the fact that the proposed transfer and change of point of diversion as prayed for would not injuriously affect the vested rights of others, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickler v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Farmers' High Line & Reservoir Co. v. WolfColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
- Bates v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Lower Latham Ditch Co. v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Tanner v. Humphreys, State EngineerUtah Supreme Court · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Farmers Highline Canal & Reservoir Co. v. City of GoldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Weibert v. Rothe Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- May v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.