Legal Opinion

Farmers Highline Canal & Reservoir Co. v. City of Golden

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 6, 1954No. 16,982PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

To review a judgment and decree favorable to defendant in error, City of Golden, in an action to change the point of diversion of certain water rights heretofore adjudicated to the Swadley ditch out of Clear Creek'upstream a distance of some five miles to the headgate of the Church ditch, plaintiffs in error present the cause in our Court by writ of error. We will herein refer to the parties as they were aligned in the trial court where the City of Golden was petitioner and plaintiffs in error appeared as respondents.

Petitioner claimed ownership of said water rights by recent purchase and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Comstock v. RamsaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  2. New Mercer Ditch Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  3. Fort Lyon Canal Co. v. ChewSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  4. Vogel v. Minnesota Canal & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  5. Brighton Ditch Co. v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Basin Electric Power Cooperative v. State Board of ControlWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Weibert v. Rothe Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. Santa Fe Trail Ranches Property Owners Ass'n v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. May v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API