Legal Opinion

Bates v. Hall

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1908No. 5653PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from El Paso District Court. Hon. Louis W. Cunningham, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

In a special proceeding brought for that purpose under the statute (Session Laws 1903,- p. 278), of which due notice to the parties affected was given, the district court rendered a decree permitting the two petitioners to change from the Stubbs and Miller ditch,' which takes water from Fountain creek in water district No. 10, El Paso' county, to ditch No. 2 of the Fountain Valley Company farther up the same stream and in the same water district, the point of diversion of their right to the use of water for irrigation, each petitioner claiming a one-sixth interest in the quantity theretofore…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New Cache la Poudre Irrigation Co. v. Water Supply & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  2. Broadmoor Dairy & Live Stock Co. v. Brookside Water & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  3. Hite v. StimmellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Vogel v. Minnesota Canal & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  2. Farmers' High Line & Reservoir Co. v. WolfColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. City of Colorado Springs v. YustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  4. New Cache la Poudre Irrigating Co. v. Water Supply & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  5. Fort Lyon Canal Co. v. Rocky Ford Canal, Reservoir, Land, Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1926

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API