Lower Latham Ditch Co. v. Bijou Irrigation Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of the City and Cownty of Denver. Hon. Frank T. Johnson, Judge. Petition by Tbe Bijou Irrigation Company to obtain a change in tbe point of diversion of water from an irrigation ditch. Prom a judgment for petitioner, The Lower Latham Ditch Company, The Union Ditch Company, The Pulton Irrigation Ditch Company, and The Platte Yalley Irrigation Company appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
This proceeding by appellee, as petitioner below, was under “an act in relation to irrigation” (Session Laws 1899, p. 235), and the object was to obtain a decree permitting á change of the point of diversion *214of the right to the use of water for irrigation originally decreed to the Frederick Brothers ’ ditch, which is situate in water district No. 2, and now owned by petitioner, to the headgate of the Bijou ditch, also owned by petitioner, and situate in water district No. 1. The cause was referred to a referee to take evidence' and make findings of fact and report a decree. The court, with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strickler v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Farmers Independent Ditch Co. v. Agricultural Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- New Cache la Poudre Irrigation Co. v. Water Supply & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- Wadsworth Ditch Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Fort Lyon Canal Co. v. Arkansas Valley Sugar Beet & Irrigated Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- East Ridge of Fort Collins, LLC v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Dallas Creek Water Co. v. HueySupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Brighton Ditch Co. v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Clodfelter v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Bamforth v. IhmsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.