Legal Opinion
Lippman v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 10, 1991No. B052715PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Appellants appeal from a judgment denying a peremptory writ of mandate compelling the City of Los Angeles and its community redevelopment agency to fund and consult with the project area committee in the implementation of the Hollywood Redevelopment Project. We ordered the appeals consolidated. For the reasons set forth, we affirm the judgment.
Facts and Proceedings Below
The Project Area Committee for the Hollywood Redevelopment Project (PAC) was formed pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 33385 et seq. and section 401 of the Hollywood Redevelopment Plan adopted by the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Takahashi v. Fish & Game CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shaw v. Hughes Aircraft Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Stonegate Homeowners Ass'n v. StabenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- City of Los Angeles v. GlairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- City of Los Angeles v. GlairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- City of Modesto v. Dow Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.