Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Glair
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 25, 2007No. B190031PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
63 Cal.Rptr.3d 280 (2007)
153 Cal.App.4th 813
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Richard J. GLAIR, Defendant and Appellant.
No. B190031.
Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Seven.
July 25, 2007.
Richard J. Glair, in pro. per, for Defendant and Appellant.
Rockard J. Delgadillo, City Attorney, Zna Portlock Houston, Managing Assistant City Attorney and Hugo S. Rossitter, Deputy City Attorney for Plaintiff and Respondent.
PERLUSS, P.J.
The City of Los Angeles applied for and, following a bench trial, obtained a workplace violence protective order on behalf of its employee…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ryan v. RosenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Fink v. ShemtovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Pacific Corporate Group Holdings v. KeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Durant v. Nicholas Grant Corp. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Jones v. Alonso CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.