Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Glair
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 25, 2007No. B190031PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*816Opinion
PERLUSS, P. J.
The City of Los Angeles applied for and, following a bench trial, obtained a workplace violence protective order on behalf of its employee Celia Mann pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 527.8.1 The order enjoins Richard J. Glair for a period of three years from coming within 100 yards of Mann and within 10 yards of any entrance to Queen Anne Park, where Mann works as the park’s director. On appeal Glair contends there was no evidence to support the court’s finding he poses a threat to Mann. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Los Angeles v. GlairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007