Legal Opinion

Takahashi v. Fish & Game Commission

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 7, 1948No. 533PublishedCited by 471 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

The respondent, Torao Takahashi, born in Japan, came to this country and became a resident of California in 1907. Federal laws, based on distinctions of “color and race,” Toyota v. United States, 268 U. S. 402, 411-412, have permitted Japanese and certain other non-white racial groups to enter and reside in the country, but have made them ineligible for United States citizenship.1 The question presented is whether California can, consistently with the Federal Constitution and laws passed pursuant to it, use this federally created racial ineligibility for citizenship as a basis for barring…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by471 opinions

  1. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

466 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API