Carson v. Elliott
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Judge.
The sole question presented is whether an easement owner was entitled to remove a physical obstruction placed in the right-of-way by owners of the land. The district court answered this question in the affirmative. We agree.
The background facts are undisputed. The litigants own summer homes on adjacent properties along the shore of Payette Lake in Valley County. A single driveway provides access to both homes. The Elliotts own the land traversed by the driveway. Carson enjoys an easement, to use the driveway. The end of the driveway is circular.
Controversy erupted when the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Reynolds Irr. Dist. v. SproatIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Herman v. CardonArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Huff v. McClannahanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. Washington Federal SavingsIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Kolouch v. KramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Luce v. MarbleIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Drew v. SorensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Pioneer Irrigation District v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.