Legal Opinion

Reynolds Irr. Dist. v. Sproat

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1948No. 7384PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice.

This action was commenced April 5, 1946, by the Reynolds Irrigation District, a quasi-municipal corporation of Owyhee County, State of Idaho, as plaintiff against Ellen T. Sproat and Hugh Sproat, husband and wife, as defendants, for the purpose of perpetually enjoining, restraining and estopping the defendants, and each of them, from using a certain ditch for conveying water to their land, or from cutting, obstructing or interfering with the use of said ditch, or from diverting any water therefrom. April 16, 1946, defendants filed a demurrer to the complaint in which it was…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Davenport v. BurkeIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Checketts v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Halsey v. Minnesota-South Carolina Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  4. Harris v. ChapmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Wieri v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1945

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Kolouch v. KramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Nelson v. MarshallIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Application of BoyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Poole v. OlavesonIdaho Supreme Court · 1960

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API