Reynolds Irr. Dist. v. Sproat
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Justice.
This action was commenced April 5, 1946, by the Reynolds Irrigation District, a quasi-municipal corporation of Owyhee County, State of Idaho, as plaintiff against Ellen T. Sproat and Hugh Sproat, husband and wife, as defendants, for the purpose of perpetually enjoining, restraining and estopping the defendants, and each of them, from using a certain ditch for conveying water to their land, or from cutting, obstructing or interfering with the use of said ditch, or from diverting any water therefrom. April 16, 1946, defendants filed a demurrer to the complaint in which it was…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Davenport v. BurkeIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Checketts v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
- Halsey v. Minnesota-South Carolina Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
- Harris v. ChapmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
- Wieri v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1945
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Kolouch v. KramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Nelson v. MarshallIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Application of BoyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Poole v. OlavesonIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.