Legal Opinion

Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. Washington Federal Savings

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2001No. 25719PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Justice.

Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District (NMID) appeals the district court’s decision denying an injunction to prohibit Washington Federal Savings (Washington Federal) from constructing a sidewalk and fence on property over which NMID has an easement for the purpose of operating, maintaining, and repairing an irrigation lateral. We affirm the decision.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

NMID delivers water from the Boise River for irrigation by its landowners through a series of canals, laterals, and drains. One of the laterals NMID operates and maintains is the Finch Lateral, which…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Anderson v. EthingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Sun Valley Shamrock Resources, Inc. v. Travelers Leasing Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Marshall v. BlairIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Conley v. WhittleseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Smith v. MittonIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Idaho Military Historical Society, Inc. v. MaslenIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Fox v. Mountain West Electric, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. MussellIdaho Supreme Court · 2003

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API