Legal Opinion

Holbert v. Wilson

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 1958No. Civ. No. 22824PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, J. pro tem.*

Defendant appeals from a decree by the terms of which he is ordered to convey certain real property to the plaintiff.

The complaint and the findings of fact are, to say the least, inartifieially drawn, but we have reached the conclusion that by the complaint, facts are alleged which spell out a cause of action and that by the findings, facts are found, which support that cause of action; and, that therefore, even though it may be that the trial court reached its decision on an erroneous theory, its judgment, being in fact correct, must be affirmed. (Sears v. Rule, 27 Cal.2d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Sherman v. SandellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Taylor v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. VanniniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peck v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API