Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Morris

California Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1912No. L.A. No. 3065PublishedCited by 35 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

The heirs at law of Zerelda S. Wheeler, deceased, are her daughters, Jessie W. Taylor and Helen O. Morris, both married women. At the time of and some time prior to the institution of this action, Helen O. Morris was and had been an incompetent person. Frank M. Kelsey was appointed her guardian ad litem. Upon the death of Zerelda S. Wheeler, testate, Jessie W. Taylor was appointed administratrix with the will annexed of her mother’s estate. Thereafter she instituted this action against Grace, Cleda, and Ethel Morris, daughters of her incompetent sister Helen, to quiet title to three separate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fanning v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Hecht v. SlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Cooney v. GlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Lauricella v. LauricellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Odell v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Smith v. LombardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Steinberger v. SteinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Airola v. GorhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. In Re Estate of ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API