Legal Opinion

Woida v. North Star Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 15, 1981No. 51391PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERSON, Justice.

Plaintiff Matt Woida brought an action seeking a judgment declaring that defendant North Star Mutual Insurance Company owed a duty to defend him in a pending lawsuit. He also alleged that defendant had an obligation to indemnify him for any judgment rendered against him. The trial court denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and sua sponte granted summary judgment for defendant. Plaintiff now appeals from the order. We affirm.

Plaintiff is a named defendant in a civil suit brought by Allen Krook, who was shot while working as a security guard. On March 14, 1978, Krook…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Continental Western Insurance v. ToalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Caspersen v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. SippleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. American Family Insurance Co. v. WalserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Independent School District No. 656Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API