Legal Opinion
Caspersen v. Webber
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 7, 1973No. 43822 and 44133PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, Justice.
Pursuant to Rule 105, Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, we granted plaintiff discretionary review of an order granting defendant a new trial unless a remittitur was agreed to and denying defendant coverage under an insurance policy issued by Indiana Lumbermans Mutual Insurance Company. Defendant has appealed from the judgment entered. We reverse in part and affirm in part.
The incident which resulted in plaintiff’s injuries occurred on November 27, 1965, at the Park Terrace Cafe in St. Louis Park, Minnesota, where plaintiff* Janet Caspersen, was employed as a hatcheck girl.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Northwestern National Casualty Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin v. Edward A. McNulty and Walter Scott SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Krueger v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Smith v. HubbardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Thill v. Modern Erecting CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Newcomb v. MeissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Associated Independent Dealers, Inc. v. Mutual Service Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Home Insurance Company v. NeilsenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.