Legal Opinion
Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Sipple
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 27, 1977No. 46693PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
Appellant Farmers Insurance Exchange appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial following a jury trial in a declaratory judgment action in district court in which it was determined that one of its homeowners policies covered an assault by the insured on a third person. We affirm.
Appellant insured Andrew Baud under a homeowners policy. The policy covered personal liability for bodily injury for each occurrence in the amount of $25,000, but contained “business pursuits” and “intentional acts” exclusion.
The insured, Baud, was employed by the State of Minnesota…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Continental Western Insurance v. ToalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Caspersen v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Brasseaux v. GirouardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Newcomb v. MeissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Milwaukee Mutual Insurance v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Transamerica Insurance Group v. MeereArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- American Family Insurance Co. v. WalserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Lanoue v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.