Legal Opinion
Continental Western Insurance v. Toal
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 18, 1976No. 45813, 45833PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MacLaughlin, Justice.
These are declaratory judgment actions by respondents, Continental Western Insurance Company and Travelers Insurance Company, seeking a determination of no insurance coverage for a killing which occurred during the course of an armed robbery by their insureds. A jury returned a special verdict finding that the killing was “expected or intended from the standpoint of [the insureds] ” who were willing participants in the armed robbery. The trial court ordered declaratory judgment in favor of the insurance companies. We affirm.
On August 6,1972, a group of individuals…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Caspersen v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Morrill v. GallagherMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Lyons v. Hartford Ins. GroupNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Vanguard Insurance Company v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Security Mutual Casualty Company v. LuthiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance v. AbernathyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. ElitzkySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.